Massachusetts Phone Call Recording Laws

Massachusetts treats secret phone call recording as a serious crime. Under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, Section 99, anyone who secretly records a phone call faces felony charges punishable by up to 5 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine. Unlike most states that classify at least some recording violations as misdemeanors, Massachusetts provides no reduced penalty tier. Every single violation is a felony.

This guide explains exactly how the Massachusetts wiretap statute applies to phone call recording in 2026, what you must do before recording any call, and the severe consequences for getting it wrong.

What Massachusetts Law Says About Recording Phone Calls

The Core Statute: Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, Section 99

The Massachusetts wiretap statute is found in Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, Section 99. Originally enacted in 1968 to combat organized crime, the law has been broadly interpreted by courts to cover all forms of wire and oral communication, including everyday phone calls.

Section 99 B.4 defines "interception" as secretly hearing or secretly recording any wire or oral communication without prior authority or consent of all parties. The key word is "secretly." The statute does not require affirmative consent from every party. Instead, it requires that every party be aware the recording is happening.

This means the statute is violated whenever someone records a phone call without the knowledge of everyone on the line, regardless of the recorder's intentions or reasons.

What "Secret" Means Under Massachusetts Law

Massachusetts courts have consistently interpreted the statute to focus on whether the recording was hidden from any party. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has held that the statute targets the clandestine nature of the recording rather than the absence of formal permission.

In practical terms, this means:

• If you announce "I am recording this call" and the other person stays on the line, the recording is legal even if the other person objects
• If you start a recording app on your phone without saying anything, the recording is illegal even if you had good intentions
• If a business plays "this call may be recorded," that announcement satisfies the statute because all parties are on notice

The distinction between awareness and consent is critical. You do not need to get a "yes" from the other party. You need to make sure the other party knows recording is occurring.

Types of Phone Calls Covered

Section 99 covers all "wire communications," which the statute defines as any aural transfer made through wire, cable, or similar connection. This includes:

• Landline telephone calls through traditional phone networks
• Cell phone calls on any cellular network
• VoIP and internet calls through platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Skype, and WhatsApp
• Video calls with audio on any platform, including FaceTime
• Conference calls with multiple participants
• Voicemail messages when intercepted during transmission

The statute does not distinguish between personal and business calls. The same felony penalties apply regardless of the purpose of the call.

Can You Record Phone Calls in Massachusetts?

Yes, but only if all parties know the call is being recorded. You must disclose that recording is taking place before capturing any conversation. There is no exception for recording your own calls. Even though you are a participant in the conversation, secretly recording it is a felony.

How to Legally Record a Phone Call in Massachusetts

To record a phone call legally in Massachusetts, follow these steps:

1. Announce the recording at the very beginning of the call before any substantive conversation
2. Be explicit with language such as "I am recording this call" or "This call is being recorded"
3. Wait for acknowledgment or at minimum give the other party a chance to disconnect
4. Do not begin recording before the announcement since even a few seconds of secret recording can trigger the statute

If the other party objects, they have the right to hang up. If they stay on the line after hearing your disclosure, the recording is lawful.

What You Cannot Do

The following actions are felonies under Massachusetts law:

• Secretly activating a call recording app without telling the other party
• Recording a phone call between two other people without authorization from all parties
• Using a listening device to capture someone else's phone conversations
• Possessing recording equipment with the intent to secretly record phone calls
• Disclosing contents of an illegally recorded phone call to anyone

Each of these carries up to 5 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine. There is no lesser charge available. Massachusetts prosecutors do not have the option of reducing a wiretap charge to a misdemeanor.

Interstate Phone Call Recording

Which Law Applies to Cross-State Calls?

When a phone call crosses state lines, the general legal principle is that the stricter state's law applies. Because Massachusetts has one of the strictest wiretap statutes in the country, its requirements almost always control the call.

If you are in Massachusetts and call someone in a one-party consent state like Texas or New York, Massachusetts law still applies to your end of the call. You must disclose that you are recording.

If someone in a one-party consent state calls you in Massachusetts and secretly records the call, they may face liability under Massachusetts law if the recording is discovered.

Federal Law Baseline

Federal wiretapping law under 18 U.S.C. Section 2511 requires only one-party consent. However, Massachusetts law is significantly stricter than the federal baseline, and state law takes precedence within Massachusetts. A recording that complies with federal law but violates Massachusetts law is still illegal if any party is in Massachusetts.

Two-Party Consent States

When calling someone in another two-party consent state, both states' laws apply. The following states also require all-party knowledge or consent:

State	Key Statute
California	Penal Code 632
Connecticut	Conn. Gen. Stat. 52-570d
Florida	Fla. Stat. 934.03
Illinois	720 ILCS 5/14-2
Maryland	Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402
Montana	Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213
New Hampshire	N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 570-A:2
Pennsylvania	18 Pa.C.S. 5703
Washington	Wash. Rev. Code 9.73.030

Even among these states, Massachusetts stands apart because it classifies every violation as a felony. Most other two-party consent states provide a misdemeanor option for less serious violations.

Business Phone Call Recording in Massachusetts

Employer Recording Requirements

Massachusetts businesses that record customer or client phone calls must provide clear, advance notice. The standard practice is to play a recorded announcement before any conversation begins, such as "This call may be recorded for quality assurance purposes."

Businesses must ensure:

• The announcement plays before any substantive conversation starts
• All employees who handle recorded calls are trained on proper disclosure procedures
• Recording policies are documented in employee handbooks and customer-facing materials
• Callers have the option to decline recording (typically by disconnecting)

What Happens When Businesses Fail to Disclose

A business that records customer calls without disclosure faces the same felony penalties as an individual. Additionally, the business may face:

• Civil lawsuits from recorded parties under Section 99 Q
• Liquidated damages of $100 per day of violation, or $1,000 minimum
• Class action liability if recording practices affect many customers
• Attorney fees and litigation costs paid to the plaintiff

Several Massachusetts businesses have faced significant litigation after employees recorded calls without following proper disclosure procedures. The risk is particularly high for call centers, insurance companies, and financial services firms.

Employee Phone Call Monitoring

Under Massachusetts law regarding employee privacy, employers who monitor employee phone calls must inform employees that monitoring occurs. Secret monitoring of employee calls violates Section 99 just as any other secret recording would. Employers should:

• Include monitoring disclosures in employment agreements
• Post visible notices near monitored workstations
• Limit monitoring to business-related calls when possible
• Never monitor personal calls without explicit disclosure

Penalties for Illegally Recording Phone Calls

Criminal Penalties

Massachusetts imposes some of the harshest criminal penalties in the country for illegal phone call recording:

Offense	Maximum Prison Term	Maximum Fine	Classification
Secret interception of a phone call	5 years (state prison)	$10,000	Felony
Possession of device with intent to secretly intercept	5 years (state prison)	$10,000	Felony
Disclosure of illegally intercepted call	2.5 years (house of correction)	$5,000	Criminal offense
Using contents of illegally intercepted call	2.5 years (house of correction)	$5,000	Criminal offense

There is no misdemeanor option. A first offense for secretly recording a single phone call is a felony carrying up to 5 years in state prison. This makes Massachusetts the strictest state in the country for phone call recording violations.

Civil Liability

Under Section 99 Q of the Massachusetts wiretap statute, victims of illegal phone call recording can file a civil lawsuit and recover:

• Liquidated damages of $100 per day of violation, or $1,000 minimum, whichever is greater
• Actual damages if they exceed the liquidated amount
• Reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
• Punitive damages in cases of willful or egregious violations

The per-day calculation means that ongoing or repeated secret recording can result in substantial financial exposure. An employer who secretly records employee phone calls for months could face damages in the tens of thousands of dollars per affected employee.

Inadmissibility of Illegally Recorded Calls

Under Massachusetts law, illegally recorded phone calls are inadmissible in criminal proceedings. The statute explicitly bars prosecutors from using evidence obtained through illegal wiretapping.

However, in Simpson v. Boston Public Health Commission (2025), a Massachusetts Superior Court judge ruled that illegally obtained recordings may be admissible in civil cases. The court found that while Section 99 bars illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials, it contains no equivalent prohibition for civil proceedings. This creates a situation where making the recording is still a felony, but the recording itself could be used as evidence in a civil lawsuit.

Using Recorded Phone Calls as Evidence

Admissibility Requirements

Phone call recordings made in compliance with Massachusetts law are generally admissible in court. To introduce a recording as evidence, you must establish:

• Legality: The recording was made with the knowledge of all parties
• Authentication: The recording is genuine, unaltered, and accurately represents the conversation
• Relevance: The recording relates to the issues in the case
• Chain of custody: The recording has been properly stored and handled
• Foundation testimony: A witness can identify the voices on the recording

Best Practices for Evidence Preservation

If you plan to use a recorded phone call as evidence:

• Keep the original file completely unedited
• Note the date, time, duration, and participants immediately after the call
• Store the original in a secure location with backup copies
• Do not share the recording unnecessarily before presenting it in court
• Consult an attorney about proper procedures for introducing recordings

AI Transcription and Phone Call Recording

AI-powered transcription tools like Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, and built-in features in Zoom and Microsoft Teams are increasingly common. In Massachusetts, these tools trigger the same legal requirements as any other recording method.

Before activating any AI transcription or recording feature on a phone call, you must inform all parties. Many AI tools join calls as a visible "bot" participant, but the presence of a bot does not substitute for explicit disclosure. You must still announce that the call is being recorded or transcribed.

Employers who deploy AI call transcription for sales teams, customer support, or internal meetings must build disclosure procedures into their workflow. The felony penalties under Section 99 apply regardless of whether the recording is made by a human pressing a button or an AI tool activated automatically.

Pending Legislation: Senate Bill S.1215

Senator Patrick O'Connor introduced Senate Bill S.1215 in the 194th General Court (2025-2026 session). This bill would create a legal defense for people who secretly record threats, harassment, or other crimes, particularly in domestic violence and child custody situations.

The bill was motivated by a 2022 case in which a woman with a restraining order secretly recorded her husband making threats over the phone. She was charged with eight counts of violating the wiretap statute, while her husband was simultaneously charged with domestic violence. As of early 2026, the bill remains pending before the Joint Committee on the Judiciary.

If passed, this legislation would not change the general prohibition on secret phone call recording. It would only provide a defense in narrow circumstances involving recorded criminal threats or harassment.

Massachusetts Recording Laws by Topic

Phone Call Recording | Audio Recording | Video Recording | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras

Back to Massachusetts Recording Laws