Australia
Wrongful Death Claims in Australia: Who Can Claim and What Compensation Covers
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 13 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Australia has no single national wrongful death law: each state and territory runs its own compensation-to-relatives Act, so a family's right to sue, who can claim, and how long they have all depend on where the death happened.
This page explains how wrongful death compensation works across Australia: the history behind these laws, the three kinds of claim a death can create, who is eligible to bring one, how the states and territories compare on solatium, contributory negligence and time limits, and where a motor vehicle or workplace death is handled instead through a different scheme. It links to a dedicated page for each state and territory with the specific figures, sections and deadlines that apply there.
Where Wrongful Death Law Comes From
At common law, a person's right to sue died with them, so nobody could bring a claim simply because someone died from another person's wrongdoing. The UK's Fatal Accidents Act 1846, known as Lord Campbell's Act, changed that by creating a new statutory right for a deceased person's family to sue for their own loss. Every Australian state and territory Act covered on this page descends from that model, including New South Wales' own Compensation to Relatives Act 1897, whose long title describes it as consolidating an earlier colonial Act for compensating the families of persons killed by accidents.
The Three Claims a Family Can Bring
A single death in Australia can give rise to as many as three separate legal claims, and they are not alternatives to each other. Every jurisdiction reviewed for this page keeps them running side by side.

The relatives' or dependants' claim is the core wrongful death action: a new statutory right, created by the state's Act, for the financial benefit of a defined group of surviving family members, measured by what the death cost them in lost financial support. It exists only because of the death and belongs to the family, not the deceased.
The estate's survival claim is separate. Whatever cause of action the deceased personally held, such as their own personal injury claim in the period between the injury and the death, survives them and can be pursued by their estate under a different, standalone Act. What survives is narrower than what the deceased could have recovered had they lived: every jurisdiction reviewed for this page excludes the deceased's own pain and suffering, and their lost future earnings, from an estate claim arising from the same death (several make a narrow exception for asbestos and other dust-disease claims), though funeral expenses are generally recoverable.
The nervous shock claim lets close relatives who witness a death, or who are told about it, bring a separate psychiatric injury claim in their own right, independent of the wrongful death and estate claims. Some states, including New South Wales, the ACT and Tasmania, define a fixed list of qualifying relatives for this claim; others, such as Victoria, leave eligibility to a general foreseeability test with no statutory list.
Who Can Sue, and Who Counts as a Family Member
In most jurisdictions, the executor or administrator of the deceased's estate brings the relatives' claim in the first instance, on behalf of the eligible family members. If there is no executor or administrator, or none has acted within 6 months of the death, most Acts let the family members concerned bring the claim themselves. Queensland stands apart: its Civil Proceedings Act lets a family member sue directly from the outset, with no waiting period. The ACT's Act does not clearly spell out an executor-first precondition either way, so its position is less settled than the others.
Which relatives count also varies by state. Some name a fixed list, typically a spouse or de facto partner, children, parents and siblings, sometimes extending to step-relations, grandparents, or a former spouse still owed financial support. Victoria instead asks only whether a person was financially dependent on the deceased, with no named categories at all. See the comparison table below and the linked state page for the exact list that applies.
Comparing the States and Territories
| Jurisdiction | Act (cause of action) | Who can claim (headline) | Solatium | Deceased's contributory negligence reduces damages | Limitation period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New South Wales | Compensation to Relatives Act 1897, ss3-8 | Spouse (incl. de facto), children, parents, siblings, half-siblings | No | Yes, since Civil Liability Act 2002 s5T overrides the older LRMP Act 1965 s13 shield | 3 years from discoverability, 12-year long-stop from death for current claims |
| Australian Capital Territory | Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002, Chapter 3 Part 3.1, ss23-27 | Domestic partner, children, parents, siblings, former spouses/partners | No | No, except where a Part 7.1 presumption applies, such as intoxication or not wearing a seatbelt | Later of 6 years from the wrongful act or 3 years from death |
| Victoria | Wrongs Act 1958 Part III, ss16-23AE | Functionally-defined dependants, no named list | No | No; s26(4) expressly protects the claim from reduction | 3 years from discoverability (no earlier than the date of death), 12-year long-stop from death |
| Tasmania | Fatal Accidents Act 1934 | Spouse/partner, parents, step-parents, grandparents, children, step/grandchildren, siblings, half-siblings | No | Yes, proportionately, under Wrongs Act 1954 s4(4) | 3 years from discoverability, extendable to 6 years by the court; no long-stop was located in this review |
| Queensland | Civil Proceedings Act 2011 Part 10, ss62-70 | Children, parents, spouse; no sibling category | No | Yes, under Law Reform Act 1995 s10(5) | 3 years from when the cause of action arose |
| Northern Territory | Compensation (Fatal Injuries) Act 1974 | Spouse/de facto (incl. former), children, parents, siblings, half-siblings | Named as a head of damages, but no amount is set; left to the court | Yes, under Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1956 s17(2) | 3 years from the date of death |
| Western Australia | Fatal Accidents Act 1959 | Spouse/de facto (2+ years), parents, grandparents, step-parents, children, grandchildren, stepchildren, siblings, a former spouse under a support obligation | No | Yes, under Contributory Negligence Act 1947 s4(2) | 3 years from the date of death |
| South Australia | Civil Liability Act 1936 (formerly the Wrongs Act 1936) Part 5, ss23-30 | Spouse, domestic partner, parent, siblings, child | Yes: $10,000 cap for a surviving spouse or domestic partner, and separately $10,000 for a killed child's parents, both fixed since 1974 with no CPI adjustment found | Yes, under s45 | 3 years from death, set in the Civil Liability Act itself, not the Limitation of Actions Act |

Solatium: The Exception, Not the Rule
Only South Australia has a solatium payment with an actual dollar figure attached. Its Civil Liability Act 1936 sets a cap of $10,000 for a surviving spouse or domestic partner (s29) and, separately, a $10,000 cap for the parents of a killed child (s28). Both figures have applied unchanged since the Wrongs Act Amendment Act 1974, with no indexation clause found anywhere in the Act, and a court can refuse solatium entirely at its discretion, having regard to the claimant's relationship with, or conduct toward, the deceased (s30).
The Northern Territory names solatium as a head of damages (Compensation (Fatal Injuries) Act 1974 s10(3)(f)) but sets no amount, no formula and no schedule anywhere in the Act; the amount, if any, is entirely up to the court under the Act's general damages provision. Whether a broader damages cap elsewhere in NT law also applies to a solatium award is not settled and is not addressed here.
Every other state and territory covered on this page has no solatium head at all. Grief itself is compensated, where it is compensated, only through a separate nervous shock claim for a diagnosed psychiatric injury, not as a standalone payment for the loss of a loved one.
The Deceased's Own Contributory Negligence
If the deceased partly caused their own death, for example through their own negligent driving, most states reduce the family's damages proportionately to reflect that. Victoria is the clear exception: its Wrongs Act expressly protects the dependants' claim from any reduction for the deceased's own contributory negligence. The ACT blocks a reduction too, but not absolutely: its Civil Law (Wrongs) Act carves out cases where a specific presumption applies, such as the deceased having been intoxicated or not wearing a seatbelt, where a reduction becomes mandatory unless that presumption is rebutted. See the comparison table above and the linked state page for how this applies where the death happened.
Motor Vehicle and Workplace Deaths
A death caused by a motor vehicle accident or in the course of employment is usually handled first through the relevant compulsory insurance scheme, not an ordinary wrongful death claim.

Motor vehicle deaths generally go through the state or territory's compulsory third party insurance scheme. Some, like the Northern Territory's and Victoria's, are no-fault schemes that pay a benefit regardless of who caused the crash; others, including Queensland's and South Australia's, are fault-based, meaning a payment depends on establishing the other driver's fault, in much the same way an ordinary claim does. See motor accident compensation in Australia and the linked state page for the scheme that applies.
Workplace deaths are generally handled through the relevant state or territory workers compensation scheme, which typically pays a lump sum and, in most states, ongoing payments to dependants, funded by the employer's compulsory insurance rather than a lawsuit against the employer. See workers compensation in Australia and the linked state page for current benefits.
Where the deceased also has assets to be distributed, the ordinary wills and probate process for that state runs alongside any wrongful death or estate claim; see wills and probate in Australia and who inherits without a will in Australia.
What This Process Is Not
A wrongful death claim is a civil action for damages. It is not a criminal prosecution: several of the Acts covered here say so directly, confirming the civil claim exists whether or not the death also amounted to a criminal offence, and it proceeds independently of any criminal case against the person responsible.
It is also not a coroner's inquest. A coroner investigates how, when and why someone died and can make recommendations to prevent similar deaths, but has no power to award compensation. Most of the Acts reviewed for this page expressly bar a coroner from finding that a person committed an offence, and Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia go further and expressly bar any finding of civil liability too. A coronial finding can be used as evidence in a later civil claim, but it does not decide the claim.
A wrongful death claim is also separate from any victims of crime compensation scheme, which exists independently in every state and territory for the financial impact of a crime itself. New South Wales, for example, pays a recognition payment to certain family members of a homicide victim through its Victims Support Scheme, currently $15,000 for a financially dependent family member or a child under 18 at the time of death, and $7,500 for a parent, step-parent, guardian, spouse or de facto partner, paid under a different Act with its own homicide-based eligibility test. It is not fully independent of a court claim, though: the Scheme Executive must have regard to any Compensation to Relatives Act damages a family victim has received or may be entitled to, and typically postpones the application until that entitlement is resolved (Victims Support Act 2013 (NSW) s44(4), s44(6A)). Each state and territory runs its own scheme with its own figures; check the relevant victims of crime agency for the position elsewhere.
State and Territory Guides
- New South Wales wrongful death claims
- Victoria wrongful death claims
- Queensland wrongful death claims
- Western Australia wrongful death claims
- South Australia wrongful death claims
- Tasmania wrongful death claims
- Northern Territory wrongful death claims
- Australian Capital Territory wrongful death claims

Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a national wrongful death law in Australia?
No. Each state and territory has its own Act, all descended from the UK's Fatal Accidents Act 1846. Which relatives can claim, whether solatium is available, how contributory negligence is treated, and the time limit all depend on which state or territory's law applies.
Who can bring a wrongful death claim?
It depends on the state. Most Acts name specific categories of relative, such as a spouse or de facto partner, children, parents and siblings, sometimes extending to step-relations, grandparents or former spouses. Victoria instead asks only whether a person was financially dependent on the deceased, with no named categories at all. See the comparison table above or the linked state page for the exact list.
What is solatium, and which states pay it?
Solatium is a payment for the grief of losing a family member, separate from compensation for lost financial support. Only South Australia sets a dollar figure: $10,000 for a surviving spouse or domestic partner and a separate $10,000 for the parents of a killed child, both unchanged since 1974. The Northern Territory names solatium as a head of damages but sets no amount, leaving it to the court. No other state or territory has a solatium payment.
Does it matter if the person who died was partly at fault for their own death?
In most states, yes: the family's damages are reduced proportionately to reflect the deceased's own share of fault. Victoria protects the claim from any such reduction. The ACT blocks a reduction too, except where a specific presumption applies, such as the deceased's own intoxication or not wearing a seatbelt.
How long do we have to file a wrongful death claim?
It varies by state, from a flat 3 years after the date of death in several jurisdictions, to a 3-year discoverability period with a 12-year outer limit in Victoria, to the ACT's rule of whichever is later of 6 years from the wrongful act or 3 years from the date of death. Check the linked state page for the period that applies rather than assuming a single national figure.
Can a coroner's inquest order compensation?
No. An inquest investigates how someone died and can recommend changes to prevent future deaths, but it has no power to award damages. Several states expressly bar a coroner from even suggesting a person is civilly liable, and none gives a coroner the power to make an award. A coronial finding can be used as evidence in a later civil claim, but it does not decide the claim.
What happens if the death happened in a car accident or at work?
It is usually handled through the state's compulsory third party insurance scheme for a motor vehicle death, or the workers compensation scheme for a workplace death, rather than a standalone wrongful death lawsuit, though in some circumstances a family can pursue more than one avenue. See motor accident compensation in Australia and workers compensation in Australia for how each scheme works.
Is a wrongful death claim the same as a victims of crime compensation payment?
No, they are separate. A victims of crime scheme, run independently in every state and territory, compensates a family for the impact of a crime itself and does not require a civil lawsuit. A wrongful death claim is a separate civil action for damages against the person or organisation responsible, and the two do not offset each other.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT)
s 23Definitions—pt 3.1In forcecited in 2 of our articles
In this part: child includes a grandchild and a stepchild. member, of a dead person’s family—each of the following people is a member of a dead person’s family: (a) a domestic partner; or (b) a child of the person (including a child born alive after the death); (c) a person to whom the dead person acted, immediately before his or her death, in place of a parent; (d) a parent of the person; (e) a person who acted, immediately before the dead person’s death, in place of a parent to the dead person; (f) a brother, a sister, a half-brother and a half-sister of the person; (g) a former spouse, civil union partner or civil partner of the person. parent includes a stepfather, a stepmother, a grandfather and a grandmother. Division 3.1.2 Liability and damages for death
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.act.gov.au
Also relied on in: Wrongful Death Claims in the ACT: Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002, Who Can Claim and Time Limits
Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
s 5TContributory negligence—claims under the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) In a claim for damages brought under the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897, the court is entitled to have regard to the contributory negligence of the deceased person. (2) Section 13 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 does not apply so as to prevent the reduction of damages by the contributory negligence of a deceased person in respect of a claim for damages brought under the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nsw.gov.au
Also relied on in: Wrongful Death Claims in NSW: Compensation to Relatives Act 1897, Who Can Claim and Time Limits
Coroners Act 2009 (NSW)
s 81Findings of coroner or jury verdict to be recordedIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) The coroner holding an inquest concerning the death or suspected death of a person must, at its conclusion or on its suspension, record in writing the coroner’s findings or, if there is a jury, the jury’s verdict, as to whether the person died and, if so—(a) the person’s identity, and (b) the date and place of the person’s death, and (c) in the case of an inquest that is being concluded—the manner and cause of the person’s death. (2) The coroner holding an inquiry concerning a fire or explosion must, at its conclusion or on its suspension, record in writing the coroner’s findings or, if there is a jury, the jury’s verdict—(a) as to the date and place of the fire or explosion, and (b) in the case of an inquiry that is being concluded—as to the circumstances of the fire or explosion. (3) Any record made under subsection (1) or (2) must not indicate or in any way suggest that an offence has been committed by any person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nsw.gov.au
Civil Liability Act 1936 (SA)
s 28Liability to parents of person wrongfully killedIn force
(1) Whenever the death of an infant is caused by a wrongful act, neglect or default, and the act, neglect or default is such as would, if death had not ensued, have entitled the infant to maintain an action to recover damages, the person who would have been liable if death had not ensued shall be liable to pay to the surviving parents or parent of the child such sum— (a) where the death occurred before the commencement of the Wrongs Act Amendment Act 1974—not exceeding one thousand dollars; or (b) where the death occurred after the commencement of the Wrongs Act Amendment Act 1974—not exceeding $10 000, as the court thinks just by way of solatium for the suffering caused to the parents or parent by the death of the child. (2) Where both parents bring an action to recover any sum of money payable under this section, the amount recovered after deducting the costs not recovered from the defendant, shall be divided between the parents in such shares as the court directs. (3) Where both parents survive the child and either of them does not join in bringing an action under this section, the other may bring an action for such amount as he claims to be due to him or her.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.sa.gov.au
Wrongs Act 1954 (Tas)
s 4Apportionment of liability in case of contributory negligenceIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) [Section 4 Subsection (1) amended by No. 39 of 2000, s. 8, Applied:29 Jun 2000] [Section 4 Subsection (1) amended by No. 41 of 2003, s. 11, Applied:04 Jul 2003] Where a person suffers damage as the result partly of that person's wrongful act and partly of the wrongful act of any other person, a claim in respect of that damage is not defeated by reason of the wrongful act of the person suffering the damage, but the damages recoverable in respect thereof shall be reduced to such extent up to 100% as the court thinks just and equitable, having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damage; but – (a) this subsection does not operate to defeat a defence arising under a contract; and (b) where any contract or enactment providing for the limitation of liability is applicable to the claim, the amount of damages recoverable by the claimant by virtue of this subsection shall not exceed the maximum limit so applicable. (2) [Section 4 Subsection (2) amended by No. 39 of 2000, s.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.tas.gov.au
Also relied on in: Wrongful Death Claims in Tasmania: The Fatal Accidents Act, Who Can Claim and Time Limits, Public Liability Claims in Tasmania: The Civil Liability Act, Injury Thresholds and Time Limits
Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic)
s 16Liability for death caused wrongfullyIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Whensoever the death of a person is caused by a wrongful act neglect or default and the act neglect or default is such as would (if death had not ensued) have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, then and in every such case the person who would have been liable if death had not ensued shall be liable to an action for damages notwithstanding the death of the person injured.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.vic.gov.au
Also relied on in: Wrongful Death Claims in Victoria: The Wrongs Act, Who Can Claim and Time Limits
s 26Liability for contributory negligenceIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) If a person (the claimant) suffers damage as the result partly of the claimant's failure to take reasonable care (contributory negligence) and partly of the wrong of any other person or persons— (a) except as provided in section 63, a claim in respect of the damage is not defeated by reason of the contributory negligence of the claimant; and (b) the damages recoverable in respect of the wrong must be reduced to such extent as the court thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damage. (1A) Subsection (1) does not operate to defeat any defence arising under a contract. (1B) If any contract or enactment providing for the limitation of liability is applicable to the claim, the amount of damages awarded to the claimant by virtue of subsection (1) is not to exceed the maximum limit so applicable. (1C) If a claim is brought in a court of limited jurisdiction, the court may award damages up to the limit of its jurisdiction even though the amount of damages has first been reduced under subsection (1) or (1B).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.vic.gov.au
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 (NSW), ss3-8(legislation.nsw.gov.au).gov
- Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s5T, contributory negligence override(legislation.nsw.gov.au).gov
- Coroners Act 2009 (NSW) s81, findings not to suggest an offence(legislation.nsw.gov.au).gov
- Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT), Chapter 3 Part 3.1, ss23-27(legislation.act.gov.au).gov
- Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) Part III, ss16-23AE and s26(4)(legislation.vic.gov.au).gov
- Fatal Accidents Act 1934 (Tas)(legislation.tas.gov.au).gov
- Wrongs Act 1954 (Tas) s4(4), apportionment on a fatal claim(legislation.tas.gov.au).gov
- Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld) Part 10, ss62-70(legislation.qld.gov.au).gov
- Coroners Act 2003 (Qld) s45(5), bars offence and civil liability findings(legislation.qld.gov.au).gov
- Compensation (Fatal Injuries) Act 1974 (NT), s10(3)(f) solatium(legislation.nt.gov.au).gov
- Fatal Accidents Act 1959 (WA)(legislation.wa.gov.au).gov
- Civil Liability Act 1936 (SA), ss28-30 solatium(legislation.sa.gov.au).gov
- NSW Victims Support Scheme, recognition payment amounts(nsw.gov.au).gov