Thompson Coburn Data Breach Settlement: Claim Window Closed
At a glance
- Status
- Pending final approval
- Defendant
- Thompson Coburn LLP
- Settlement fund
- $7,500,000
- Claim deadline
- July 23, 2026
- No-proof cash option
- Yes — ~$150 estimated pro-rata cash payment ('Cash Payment B'), no proof required -- official FAQ states the amount 'could be higher or lower' depending on total claims filed, it is not a guaranteed flat $150, or up to $5,000 documented out-of-pocket losses ('Cash Payment A')
- Max documented payout
- $5,000
- Administrator
- Simpluris
- Official site
- tcdatasettlement.com
- Court
- Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri
- Case number
- 2622-CC00320
Last verified September 27, 2026
Key dates
| Milestone | Date | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Claim deadline | July 23, 2026(passed) | Last day to file for a payment |
| Opt-out (exclusion) deadline | August 7, 2026(passed) | Last day to leave the settlement and keep the right to sue |
| Objection deadline | August 7, 2026(passed) | Last day to object to the terms |
| Final approval hearing | August 22, 2026(passed) | When the judge decides whether to approve the settlement |
| Expected payout | Not yet scheduled | Payments are not sent until after final approval and any appeals |
Where to file
Thompson Coburn LLP Data Breach Settlement (Salazar v. Thompson Coburn) is administered by Simpluris. The only place to file is the official settlement website:
Verify on the official sitetcdatasettlement.com
Filing is free. No legitimate settlement charges a fee to file a claim.
You cannot file on RecordingLaw.com. We are an independent publisher, not the settlement administrator, and we are not affiliated with any court, agency, or defendant.
What Happened
Thompson Coburn LLP, a law firm, suffered a cyberattack in May 2024. The firm later notified individuals that their personal information had been exposed as a result, and it sent notice to people whose data it held not because they were the firm's own clients, but because the firm was acting as outside counsel for other organizations. The court-authorized settlement notice specifically names Presbyterian Health Services among the entities whose information was affected, alongside the firm's own current and former clients.
That is the detail that trips most people up. If you received a notice about this settlement and never hired Thompson Coburn, you are not imagining a mistake. A hospital or another organization can hand a law firm access to patient or customer records for legal work, and if that firm's systems are breached, the people whose records it was holding get pulled into the notice, even though they never had a direct relationship with the firm.
A lawsuit followed, Salazar v. Thompson Coburn, filed in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, case number 2622-CC00320. The parties reached a proposed settlement to resolve the claims rather than litigate them to a verdict.
Where the Settlement Stands Right Now
As of September 9, 2026, this settlement has not been finally approved. It is in the pending final approval phase, which means a judge has reviewed the proposed deal but has not yet signed off on it. The Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis set a final approval hearing for August 27, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. Central Time, at 10 N. Tucker Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63101, according to the court-authorized Long Form Notice and the settlement FAQ. The administrator's own dates summary page listed a different date, August 22, 2026. Both dates have now passed, and as of September 9, 2026 no ruling has been posted on the official site, so the official site remains the place any order will appear first.
Until the judge approves the settlement, no money moves. There is no confirmed payment date, and any site or message that promises a specific payout date before final approval is getting ahead of the actual process. If the settlement is approved without changes, payments typically follow some weeks or months after, but that timeline is not yet set here.
Who Is in the Class
The court has defined the Settlement Class as "all persons in the United States who were sent notice of the Data Incident as identified in the Class List," a list compiled by Thompson Coburn. In practice, that reaches beyond the firm's own clients: the settlement notice names Presbyterian Health Services, alongside the firm's current and former clients generally, among the entities whose information was compromised, accessed, or otherwise impacted by the breach. If you received a written notice about this incident, you are almost certainly part of the class the settlement describes, whether or not you ever had a direct relationship with Thompson Coburn itself.
The official settlement website lists the categories of information involved in the incident as name, date of birth, protected health information, health insurance information, prescription or treatment information, clinical information, medical provider information, passport number, driver's license information, and Social Security number. Not every class member had every category exposed, so treat the notice you actually received as the more complete description of what happened to your own information.
If Your Notice Lists Your Social Security Number
The free step comes first: a credit freeze at Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion blocks most new accounts from being opened in your name. If the notice you received lists your Social Security number, a freeze will not tell you whether that number turns up on the dark web. Aura sends dark-web alerts for your Social Security number and monitors your credit at all three bureaus, as an optional paid layer on top of the freeze.
See What Aura MonitorsAffiliate disclosure: if you sign up through this link we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
How Much You May Realistically Get
There are two payment tiers, and most people should expect the smaller one. The realistic outcome for someone who files without any documentation is an estimated pro rata cash payment of roughly $150, called Cash Payment B. That figure is not guaranteed. The settlement's own FAQ says the actual amount could end up higher or lower than $150 once the total number of valid claims and the court-approved fees and costs are known. This is a common fund; it gets divided among however many people file, so the more people who claim, the smaller each no-proof share can get.
The second tier, Cash Payment A, reimburses documented out-of-pocket losses connected to the breach, up to $5,000. This is a ceiling, not a typical payment. Very few claimants in a settlement like this actually document losses anywhere near that maximum, and this tier is only for people who genuinely spent money or lost time dealing with fraud, credit monitoring fees, or identity restoration tied to this specific breach.
What Proof You Need, by Tier
For the no-documentation pro rata payment, the settlement does not require proof of loss; you attest that your data was involved and file a claim. For the documented-loss reimbursement, you need supporting records, such as bank or credit card statements, receipts, or other paperwork tying a specific loss to this breach. Claims without adequate support in that tier are the ones most likely to be reduced or denied, so keep any paperwork you already have before you file.
How to File
Claims were submitted through the official settlement website, tcdatasettlement.com, which is run by the court-appointed administrator, Simpluris. The claim window has closed, so that site is now the place to check on a claim you already filed rather than to start a new one. It walked claimants through choosing a payment tier and, for documented losses, uploading supporting records. RecordingLaw.com is not the administrator, the court, or a filing venue; we are an independent publisher explaining the case, and any claim has to be filed on the official site itself.
One detail is easy to miss because the dates ran in an order that feels backward. The claim deadline, July 23, 2026, came before the exclusion and objection deadlines, both set for August 7, 2026. That meant someone who decided not to file a claim, or who simply missed the claim deadline, could still act by August 7, and there were two different ways to do it. Opting out means leaving the class entirely: you give up any payment from this fund, but you keep the right to sue Thompson Coburn on your own over the same breach. Objecting is different: you stay in the class and remain eligible for a payment, but you tell the court in writing, before the hearing, that you think some part of the deal is unfair. Both were real, separate choices from simply filing a claim, and both stayed open for about two more weeks after the claim window closed. All three of those deadlines have now passed.
Because this breach reached people through a law firm's outside-counsel work rather than a company they signed up with directly, be alert to any text or email that references this settlement or a law firm data breach and asks you to click a link, confirm your Social Security number, or pay a fee to "process" your claim. The real administrator, Simpluris, does not charge to file, and legitimate settlement communications will point back to tcdatasettlement.com rather than asking for payment information up front.
If You Missed the Deadline or Have Not Filed
The claim window closed on July 23, 2026, and the exclusion and objection windows closed on August 7, 2026, so none of those options is still available. There are still concrete steps worth taking regardless of where this settlement stands.
Place a free credit freeze with all three major credit bureaus, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion. A freeze is free by federal law and blocks most new accounts from being opened in your name. If you find evidence your information has actually been misused, the Federal Trade Commission's IdentityTheft.gov walks you through reporting it and building a personal recovery plan. Because this breach touched health-related records for many class members, including protected health information and health insurance details described in the settlement notice, it is also worth reviewing your explanation-of-benefits statements from your health plan for any service or claim you do not recognize, not just your bank and credit card statements. For the bank and card side, a paid service such as Aura can add alerts for unusual spending on the accounts you link to it, on top of your own review; the health-plan statements are still yours to check.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the claim deadline for the Thompson Coburn LLP data breach settlement?
The claim deadline was July 23, 2026, and it has passed. As of September 9, 2026 the settlement is no longer accepting claims.
I never hired Thompson Coburn. Why am I part of this settlement?
Thompson Coburn is a law firm, and the settlement notice names Presbyterian Health Services among the entities whose information the firm held and whose data was affected by its May 2024 cyberattack, alongside the firm's own current and former clients. That is how the breach reached the records of people who never had a direct relationship with the firm itself.
How much money will I get from the Thompson Coburn settlement?
Most class members who file without documentation can expect an estimated pro rata cash payment of about $150, called Cash Payment B, though the settlement administrator says this figure could be higher or lower depending on the total number of claims filed. No specific amount is guaranteed.
Can I get more than the $150 pro rata payment?
Class members with documented out-of-pocket losses tied to the breach, such as receipts for credit monitoring or identity restoration, may instead file for reimbursement of up to $5,000 under Cash Payment A, which requires supporting records rather than just an attestation.
What if I want to opt out and sue Thompson Coburn on my own?
The exclusion deadline was August 7, 2026, which fell after the July 23, 2026 claim deadline, and it has passed. Opting out by that date meant giving up any payment from this fund in exchange for keeping the right to bring an individual lawsuit. The same August 7, 2026 date was the deadline to object instead, which let a class member stay in the class and remain eligible for a payment while telling the court in writing that part of the deal was unfair. Both windows are now closed.
When will the Thompson Coburn settlement be finalized?
The Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri set a final approval hearing for August 27, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. Central Time, in Salazar v. Thompson Coburn, case number 2622-CC00320, according to the court-authorized Long Form Notice; the administrator's own dates page separately listed August 22, 2026. Both dates have passed. As of September 9, 2026 no ruling has been posted on the official site, so the settlement is not yet approved and no payment date has been set.
I missed the claim deadline. What can I do now?
The claim window closed on July 23, 2026. Place a free credit freeze with Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion, watch your account and health-plan statements, and use the FTC's IdentityTheft.gov if you find evidence your information was actually misused.
Who administers the Thompson Coburn settlement, and can RecordingLaw.com file my claim?
Simpluris is the court-appointed administrator, and the official site is tcdatasettlement.com. RecordingLaw.com is an independent publisher, not the administrator, the court, or a filing venue, so any claim has to be filed directly on the official site.
How to tell a settlement notice is real
Check the case name, case number, and court against the official settlement site. Go to that site directly instead of clicking a link in an email or text. Nobody legitimate will call, text, or email out of the blue asking for your Social Security number, bank account, or card details, and nobody will charge you to file. Report anyone who does at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Already have a notice with a link or sender address? Paste it into our settlement notice checker to compare it with the official claim sites we track.
Informational only. Not legal, tax, or financial advice, and not affiliated with any settlement.
RecordingLaw.com is an independent legal-information publisher. We are not a law firm, not a settlement administrator, and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any court, government agency, defendant, or claims administrator described on this page. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship.
We do not process claims and we never collect your claim information. You cannot file a claim on RecordingLaw.com. To file, opt out, object, or check your status, use only the official settlement administrator identified above. We link to it for your convenience.
Filing a legitimate claim is free. No legitimate settlement or administrator will charge you a fee to file, or ask for your Social Security number, bank, or card details by unsolicited call, text, or email. If someone does, it is likely a scam. Report it at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Deadlines, amounts, and approval status change and are set by the court. We verify against the official administrator and court records, but confirm the current details on the official site before acting. Nothing here guarantees eligibility, a payment, or any amount. Settlement payments may be taxable. See IRS Publication 4345. and consult a tax professional. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state. Affiliate disclosure.
Updates
Added the categories of personal information the official settlement website lists as involved in the Thompson Coburn data incident, including Social Security and passport numbers.
Updated settlement status and dates: Title 'What to Know' carried no status now now 'Claim Window Closed'
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XXVI (TRADE AND COMMERCE), Chapter 407
§ 407.1500Definitions — notice to consumer for breach of security, procedure — attorney general may bring action for damages.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
1. As used in this section, the following terms mean: (1) "Breach of security" or "breach", unauthorized access to and unauthorized acquisition of personal information maintained in computerized form by a person that compromises the security, confidentiality, or integrity of the personal information. Good faith acquisition of personal information by a person or that person's employee or agent for a legitimate purpose of that person is not a breach of security, provided that the personal information is not used in violation of applicable law or in a manner that harms or poses an actual threat to the security, confidentiality, or integrity of the personal information; (2) "Consumer", an individual who is a resident of this state; (3) "Consumer reporting agency", the same as defined by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Also relied on in: Missouri AI Laws and Regulation (2026), Missouri Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026), Missouri Biometric Privacy Laws: Collection, Consent & Penalties (2026)
Sources and References
- IdentityTheft.gov, the FTC's official identity theft recovery resource(identitytheft.gov).gov
- FTC Consumer Advice: Credit Freezes and Fraud Alerts(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- HHS Office for Civil Rights: HIPAA Information for Individuals(hhs.gov).gov
- Thompson Coburn LLP Data Breach Settlement, official administrator site(tcdatasettlement.com)
- Thompson Coburn LLP Data Breach Settlement, Frequently Asked Questions(tcdatasettlement.com)
- Thompson Coburn LLP Data Breach Settlement, court-authorized Long Form Notice (PDF)(simpluris.com)